Oh sorry about that I meant to type in Pelosi was part of the House, I was in a rush when I typed this last night, but anyway back to the point. First lets get the unpleasantness out of the way. Youmade a statement of my last sentence being arrogant. Yet you call my entire post worthless? I'm afraidI see a tad of arrogance there myself. The laststatement in my previous postis a saying, meant to be takenas a joke. Now back to the present.I'm not an expert in politcs, butI dolove a good debate, so thankyou for obliging me[8D]. Anyway, I haven't researched muchon Joe Biden, he probably has done some worthwhile things for this country. But, take a look at his past voting record and its quite obvious that he is a very strong advocate for gun control. I do not believe that guns can be taken away, but I do believe they can chip away at our gun rights piece by piece, and make the cost of gun ownership very expensive(ammo taxes). Anybody remember the AWB (Assault Weapons Ban) under the Clinton administration? At one point that was on Obamas website, saying he planned to reinstate it. Basically making it illegal to purchase an AR-15 or similar firearm. Therefore yet another strike at the Second Amendment.

Now for your second point. Yes some of the companies recieving money will create jobs. But there are several that as you said, seem quite worthless. As for ACORN, I don't see how they will aid in job creation or stimulation of our economy. I see that money funding further anti-gun and anti-hunting projects, so I would think anyone that enjoys hunting and gun ownership would be concerned. As for abortion, you and I are on opposite sides of the fence, my friend. I personally do not agree with abortion in any shape or form, and to me there is no way to kill a child the "right" way.

Your third point. I did not agree with everything Bush did during his administration, especially his tax cuts. So yes, I'll agree with you there. But it seems President Obama is talking about wealth redistribution on a much larger scale, almost to the degree of socialism. And I do applaud President Obama for capping executive pay.

Now to your fourth and final point. As for the arrogance statement, I addressed that earlier in this post. As for Obama's tax cuts, I know all about those. Yes I understand he was talking about taxing those that made 250,000 and more. But if you have noticed, it seems he has backed off that stance lately. Haven't heard much about that in the last several weeks, have we? And even if he does put these taxes into place, I'm still not sure I agree with them. Those people making that kind of money had ambition and worked hard to get to that point (not saying that people making less don't work hard, trust me, I farm, and I don't see near that kind of money), but placing exorbitant taxes on them is almost like putting a penalty on success. I'll check back in tonight after work, I look forward to continuing this debate. Have a good day.