"Doesn't everyoneagree that WMU's came about as a result of cost cutting?"

No.At the time their finances were in much bettershape. The reason for the larger wmus wasso doe tags could be used more effectively in reducing the herd and more could be sold by not limiting their area of use so much. Pgchas stated at several meetings since that they have no interest in going to smaller wmus. Straight from Rosenberry himself. And that is money or no money. All smaller wmus would accomplish would be to allow more deer where they could be had, and alleviating complete and total blanket reduction. Unfortunately that isnt a concern or priorty of pgcs, and without arm twisting, it likely never will be.

"So, perhaps with a license increase (yea, I know) they could affordto go back to the way it was before the decimation ofdeer in some area's. Or,should I be accused of having visions of grandeur?"

Ive followed pgcs position on these issues closely for years. Pgc has no plans of going to smaller wmus if they gain funding.