Hmmm...
First, we have this quote from our very own PA Game Commission WCO R.S. Bodenhorn.
I am becoming more and more convinced that wildlife management would be better off if we worked from the general fund and told hunter to take a flying leap with their money.
Then we have this quote from the anti's, "PA Wildlife Alliance".
[Bold]The commission should be funded by general funds. [/Bold]But now in a time of great
economic problems, the funding to achieve its conervation purpose can be
initiated in various ways. We give some examples; thought should produce
others. The public can contribute if a line is added to the state income tax
return where individuals can donate $20 or more for the support of the
commission. Another wildlife license plate can be instituted. The state game
lands (1.4 million acres), deeded to the PA Commonwealth to be used by the
commission, can and should be opened, developed, and used as state parks for
all the people. A moderate entrance fee can be charged to support the
commission and maintain these parks.
Does anybody else but me see any similarities? What are we supposed to think, D i c k?