We know you don’t understand it. You never have and most likely never will, but I will explain it for those that might be interested in the answer.
I understand the plan good enough so that my predictions regarding buck harvests, breeding rates and total harvests were dead on,while yours were dead wrong.
The reason the deer density numbers are no longer the largest force in deer management was because they were estimated numbers that had way to much variability in their degree of accuracy. They had such a low reliability because they were estimated numbers that came from the end result of using many other estimated numbers to reach that bottom line estimate
Guess what sport, the PGC is still using the same estimated numbers that they used in the past to establish antlerless allocations. Every year they estimate the change the deer populations and in order to calculate that change they have to know the estimated populations for the two years involved.
But, neither your comment or my answer, in response, have anything to do with the topic so why are you going in that direction yet again?
The topic is the delay in the audit and the audit would address the very issues we are discussing.