Its very hard to come up with anything positive to say about the P.G.C. ,who pays them seems to be a mute point at this time. Their agenda is set in stone and no one or thing will change that.
The P.G.C. has alienated the very people that formed it.
WeAs hunters only make up 8 % of the total population, soit appears to me that they are looking for support from the other 82 % that don't hunt. That support should be far reaching and easily obtained as many of them are against hunters & hunting also,
I'm not a big conspiracy guy like some here,but its plane to see that there is more to this deer program than meets the eye. with habitat being the driving force behind it how can anyone explain the 1 % timber harvest goals set up for state land. This being done in a time of financial need ?