Thank you Canuck forpointing out the other differences. Am I mistaken, are the minimum scoreslower also? If this is the case, it would appear more deer would meet this minimum. And thus, more hunters would have record deer (which translates into more money for the keeper, if they charge a fee). I do not feel this method is a joke. It's just different and it's basis retains the hub as found in all major scoring methods (B&C, P&Y, SCI, etc).

just saying and not trying to ruffle any feathers....