Well, they can get hot around the collar, but it is our money that's paying the CRP. I'm not talking about leasing (paying a fee). We shouldn't have to pay. We already do with our taxes. Especially the land that's not fit for planting, we should be allowed to hunt it. Who besides me has thought about this? Lanse, what do you think? Am I on to something here?
ORIGINAL: Lanse couche couche
When you talk about folks whose land is in CRP being required to allow public access to it for hunting, you have some folks get hot around the collar. I'm not sure what the rules are in terms of if someone is permitted to lease land for hunting that is also in CRP.