Iwas a member here for about the same time I was in HPA.I only logg on at work and every now and then,I can't access certain sites that have anything to do with hunting so I've changed my screen name but it was always close.Actually BB,it was me that referred you to this site.You know darn well that I opposed Alt and his methods of spreading his message from the beginning and never waivered from my opinion.

Cornelius,I've never defended Kathy Davis during any discussion.Please show me where I've ever supported reducing the herd past the PGC goals.2ahad over 100 dpfsm in 2001.Alot less deer was obviously the way to go and the data supports that.Does it need further reduced now?I don't know but I've never stated that it does.I just find it comical thatyou hunt in the wmu that has the highest dd in the entire state and still bawl that it isn't enough.Wow,40 dpsm in an area that's only about 50% forested.No wonder it was one of the poorest conception rates for fawns in the entire state.


I understand the importance of good habitat and I understand how deer can effect that habitat.I have no problem finding and harvesting deer in the WMU that has the lowest deer density in the entire state.We have less deer now,as we should and it doesn't bother me or have any effect on my hunting experience or success rate.