Rsb is an extremist in his views. He doesnt speak in any way for the biologists at pgc. Rsb doesnt agree with pgc data. His position is above and beyond anything pgc has documented. He doesnt believe the deer herd is low enough where pgc has stated it is and their goals are stabilization and he doesnt agree with the health assessments of herd and habitat. His views are much closer to the naturalists at audubon and other extremely anti-deer groups that want even far fewer than pgc thinks necessary. And considering howanti-deer pgc is these days,that is saying something to go above and beyond!

As for using pgc data, If you use pgc data to disprove the plan then the guys who believe it to be gospel have no excuse. And if you dont believe that data, then it matters not, since you are basically agreeing that the plan is based on either flawed "science" or none at all.

Pgcs own data doesnt support the plan.