But bluebird, this nonsense of AR actually producing smaller bucks is ridiculous. How can it? If we save a few bucks every year to allow him to get a little older, he's bound to be a bit bigger the following year. Even if the mystical spike is just that, a deer that is inferior, you're still, on average going to see larger bucks.
If it is ridiculous ,would you please explain why it happened in Miss?
BTW, just so you understand my position here is what I am saying. The average 2.5 buck produced by a non-AR herd will be bigger than the average 2.5 produced by an AR herd. Both the Kroll study and the statewide results from Miss. confirm that position. Now can you produce anything to refute it.