"Confused,I appologize because you post was well thought out.Unforunately,right off the back several people have to start complaining about no deer and making false accusations that border on slander."
I see no denial.
"Once again,I have to add that they have no facts to back up their riduiculous assertations."
The facts have been posted to YOU on several boards including this one SEVERAL times each, and you are well aware. Need I attach a permanent attachment to every post to prevent your decietful "playing dumb"?
"That's where the problems start.People with misguided and uneducated opinions start brewing up conspiracy theories and making false acusation.I'm still waiting for anything that resembles a shred of proof concerning anyone at the PGC or the volunteer commissioners benefitting monetarily from a reduced deer herd.It's friggin ridiculous."
As are your posts. Iexplained pgc'smotivations and anyone close to the issue pretty muchknows it. Many of us state it matter of factly, others will deny the truth tothe end. Well guess what douge. The end is near. How muchlonger will PGc hold out without cash without making change?Or will they go broke? Neither here nor there to me. Might be better if thefrauds get tossed. If they do change things upto get license increase, they'll be back to no good and "staying the course" immediately after anyways. Time to clean house. 3 commissioner chairs to fill.Ifntheres a shred of justice left in this state, they'll be replaced with prohunting commissioners and not the likes of those treehuggers.
"cornelius,according to the 2006 annual report,2S had 40 preseason dpsm(yeah that's really something to complain about)while 2B had 36 dpsm and 5c had 32 dpsm."
Yeah doug. It went up. ha ha ha. 10,000 more tags thanalong with the smaller herdwhen 10,000 less actuallyactually reduced thethen largerherd approx 7%..and now all of the sudden the herd ROSE. Brilliant! (LOL) Then since 06throw in the ehd and even HIGHER tag numbers during the 2007 season.... .[:'(]
"We still have guys complaining that they aren't seing 30 deer a day anymore."
Ha ha ha. Try 3 to 7.. On a good day. Ha ha 30. Your a funny guy. Youve also highlighted my statement about your "other" agenda. By doing exactly what Id accused you of doing..YET AGAIN. I stated Pgc manages the herd (supposedly[8D]) on herd health, habitat and human conflict. Based on those things there is no reason for the herd to be further decreased in the wmu and pgc even says the goal is STABILIZATION not DECREASE..and in that context it doesnt matter if the herd dd is 9 or 90.. Goal is NOT to decrease, yet the allocation says otherwise as Ive shown you, is not debatable...Time and again, yet you try to dodge the issue. Why is that? Forget wether I have a right to be "upset" or not in your opinion. I pointed out a pgc flat out lie. Proving they CANNOT be trusted at the very least. And very well points to their "other" agendas. Agendas which I know beyond doubt you are well aware of, and apparently support. They are still trying to lower the herd in areas of claimed stabilization without claiming to do so because they simply cannot scientifically justify it up front. But less deer = less deer for the ecofruitcakes who they are currently tighter than two coats of paint with.