Some of us apparently DONT WANT answers because they work with or closely with pgc. Aside from pgc and some ecofruitcakes THE HUNTERS WANT CHANGES. No division. The huge majority want some common things....More deer where they can be. Smaller wmus... The numbers of deer increases may be debatable, but unreasonable to think a happy medium COULDNT be implemented.

The "right" answer for the deer is not ONLY what is currently being done, and from a hunters perspective it is about the worst.

Dont insult our intelligence by telling us we must stick with the worst scenario because we cant make EVERYONE happy! (LOL) that rediculous.

Smaller wmus are no problem at all. Its is done in other states (gasp!) and somehow they manage it!...and the management is far better and hunters happier there (or just about ANYWHERE) than they are in Pa.

You cut the tags and there are no maleffects as long as the worse areas arent permitted to be increase. Put the deer where the deer can be.

Many arent pushing for 1.6 million deer. Just a better situation and more deer where they can be, and that is somewhere between where we are statewide now and where we were before.

And for those who think its impossible to get pgc to do so, I beg to differ. PGc is in financial dire situation. They cannot remain pig-headed catering to ecofools much longer as long as legislators keep looking out for us and prevent the license fee increase until responsible changes are made.

The problem isnt the ones wanting more deer. Its idiots at pgc who have no desire to take hunters into consideration at all and are COMPLETELY inflexible, and even though there are as many managemet schemes across the country as there are states with whitetails, they seem to want us to beleive every single thing HAS TO BE EXACTLY AS IT IS NOW...And thats pure bologna!