ORIGINAL: crokit
bluebird2=BS. No offense meant, but that falls under the category of don't believe everything you read. The only way that theory could be true is if the majority of buck allowed to reach 2.5 and older are inferior to begin with. THAT is not believable.
Before you tell some one they are posting BS , you should at least take the time to educate yourself on the subject. If the article was BS ,can you explain why the results of ARs in Miss. support the conclusions of the article?
The only way that theory could be true is if the majority of buck allowed to reach 2.5 and older are inferior to begin with.
The majority of bucks saved by ARs are in fact inferior to the average buck saved in a non-AR herd. The Kroll study in Texas proved spikes were inferior for the rate of antler development.