So why hasn't the USP or anyone else come up with their own research if they and you are so sure of the results?

The breeding rates and embryo studies do show cause to take another look but there are not enough samples yet nor enough of a sustained change to draw a responsible scientific conclusion.

Game agencies and biologists across the country have continually shown their support for the PGC's methods and game management but no one in the USP etc crowd has an answer as to why all those professionals are "wrong".

Why not try and support your position with some real facts? By that I mean facts that come from credible profesional sources. Maybe because there are none?