He was quick to change the course when a problem surfaced. An example that comes to mind was the one year experiment with having a one day concurrent buck doe season on the last day of the old buck season. It caused an exceptionally high buck kill that day and was never done again.
You really have no idea what you are talking about. Alt increased the doe season in 2000 to 4 days ,including the last Sat, of buck season in order to increase the doe harvest. He implemented the concurrent seasons in 2001 to increase the doe harvest even more ,but he reduced the doe tags too much so the antlerless harvest decreased , but the buck harvest remained the same as in 2000. ARs were implemented in 2002 to reduce the harvest of 1.5 buck and as a result of ARs and HR the buck harvest has declined from 203K in 2001 to 109K in 2007.
The buck dispersal study duplicated the work done by D, Rosenberry before he came to PA. The antlered buck study and the doe study duplicated studies in other states and did little to contribute to the knowledge of of whitetail deer. The Miss. study on on ARs was more extensive than any other study and showed that the average rack size of 2.5+ buck decreased statewide.