Just curious as to how the DNR will adjust, if at all, to a harvest that was 20% lower than last year. What is most troubling is that in August of '08 they had already created an "EAB Watchlist", apparently based on the assumption that there was no way they could mess up herd population estimates.See below: funny how they think...or thought...the state had such apopulationissue despite the facts...a20% drop in harvest...proving them way, WAY off.

So let's hear some guesses...how many think the DNR trims this way back, or comes up with some perverse reasons to justify more EAB?