"Do you have anything that helps support your opinions that it th ecurrent deer management is wrong other then the fact that you don't like nor understand the reasons or need for the current deer management program? "

I understand it far better than you apparently. Fact is it was FAR from needed AS IMPLEMENTED. Its nothing more than an extreme program brought about by ecoextremists.

"The professionals have provided a lot of facts, that the deer provided, that do support the current direction."

Yeah. Such as we'd have more and bigger bucks, we'd have improved breeding rates,higher fawns per doe, andmore... How much of that has occurred?? LOL Even by Pgcs numbers....NADA. There is also a difference between general direction and exactly what has been done. In areas where needed, getting the herd more in line with habitat may be common sense "direction", but the extremes actually implemented in most cases are complete unsupported nonsense.

"What have you provided that proves them wrong other than you and many other hunters would like to see more deer? You are entitled to your opinions but that certainly doesn’t make your opinions correct"

Ive provided far more than enough to counter the "nothing" that you have provided to SUPPORT the program. Therefore, we hafta assume an eco-extreme agenda isin play with our "program". How else do you explain clinging to a MISERABLY PROVEN FAILED PROGRAM, which you cannot even point to one stinkin' shred of evidence, that its working AT ALL,statewide or at least over most of thestate,yet much evidence to the contrary exists??

Many areas of the state have and have had ZERO habitat issues and low human conflict yet were severely reduced. Others had SOME issues but were far overkilled. Prove to me otherwise?....I thought not.