ORIGINAL: bluebird2
From what you are posting it certainly seems that it is you who has no idea what high grading is. High grading has nothing to do with when the does are bred it is all about what bucks are breeding the does and in the case of high grading it would be inferior bucks because the better bucks had been harvested prior to the breeding cycle.
You really are a laugh riot since you just contradicted yourself in a single sentence and that is quite an accomplishment. But just for laughs let's assume the nonsense you post is true. You just admitted that due to ARs in Miss. inferior bucks would be doing most of the breeding and based on your theory the same thing would happen a year later in PA when the inferior 2.5 bucks that were saved by ARs as 1.5 buck, become the dominant breeding bucks.
That is exacly what I have been saying all along ,so are you finally agreeing or are you going to recant what you said?
I didn’t contradict myself at all. It is just that you either aren’t very knowledgeable on the subject you want to debate, you are just talking nonsense or you are seriously deficient in reading comprehension. I could only guess at which it is.
Once again in Mississippi they killed their better bucks before they had a change to breed even one time, thus many of their bucks never got to pass on their genes and those were in fact the bucks with the better antlers. In Pennsylvania we don’t kill any of our bucks until they have had the change to breed and pass on their genes. In Pennsylvania most bucks, both the best and worst, breed and pass on their genes several times before the season even starts, thus there is little to no chance of high grading.
If you aren’t capable of understanding the significance of that difference and how it can result in high grading in Mississippi but not in Pennsylvania then I guess you just aren’t intelligent enough to understand even the elementary level topics of genetics or the possibility of high grading.
R.S. Bodenhorn