Rsb, Pgcs data CLEARLY shows decreases in embryo counts per doe, as well as no improvement in breeding window and actual decrease in percentage of adult does bred. This is ALL counter to what the program was supposed to do.

If its your contention not enough data were compiled per area to show true stats comparable to previous years data, then you are saying flat out pgc is flying completely blind. I guess that would make USP's lawsuit legitimate and no so stupid after all.

We are sticking to a completely failed plan that is not supported by data compiled, and its not supported by the hugemajority of our states hunters. Its actually kind of scary for our sport to have people like you who blindly support a bottomed out deer plan and would undoubtedly support it no matter what, even if it meant half the deer we have now for no good reason. From your perspective the ONLY failure could be allowing reasonable numbers of deer where they can and should be. As far as too few? Apparently to you, there never could be, and the maleffects of that to our sport or anything else, not even given a second thought.

Sorry, but time for a change of direction.