Please don't tell me that we're resorting to using info from taxidermists.I personally can't think of a more ridiculous sample group to take.Not onlt that,but if all we can expect is a 2% increase in point # and 5% increase in antler spread,we've wasted a lot of time and effort on what is a unpopular program already.Sorry,but think about it, 2% means all of 2 deer out of 100 is all it would take to back up these numbers. 2 DEER !!!! Give me a break.