HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Widest fixed blade broad head?
View Single Post
Old 11-06-2008 | 05:02 PM
  #22  
TEmbry's Avatar
TEmbry
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Widest fixed blade broad head?

ORIGINAL: GMMAT



That's hilarious.....lol.

Your line (vessel) WOULD run parallel to the rage blades......

I'm out. It's become ludicrous.....and I'm not even touting the rage heads!

Answer me this.....WHich head has a better chance.....by virtue of "odds" of hitting the most vital organs? Remember you're guessing on the orientation of the blades before they enter the chest cavity.
I was pointing out that it COULD pass by closer than a fixed 4 blade could. Sorry facts run you away from a debate.

I agree a Rage creates a much bigger swath and devistation...but this doesnt mean it automatically kills anything in its 2" circle, it cuts a straight 2 inch gash...other BHs slice the same amount of tissue, only in a smaller area...4 blades with 1.25" cutting diameter means it is cutting 2.5" of tissue with its blades. Why is having this cut tissue extended out on the end of two blades better than having it perpendicular from the two blades?


Answer this, if you put the arrow in the vital organs, which BH cuts more tissue while going through lungs...a 4 blade 1.25 cutting diameter or a 2 blade 2 inch cutting diameter?
TEmbry is offline  
Reply