ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Your question, in that context makes no sense. One cant assume that junior hunters are the only new hunters nor can you compare just those two numbers to ask your question.
Just because you can't comprehend it ,doesn't mean it doesn't make sense. If the number of junior hunters equals or exceeds the total number of hunters lost during the perior, then any new additional adult hunters would offset the loss even more.
You want to argue about the decline in license sales ,but you don't even know how to access the PA license sales data. Now that's hoot!!!
You want me to explain this statement made by you:
There was no lie in my post and you obviously don't know what you are talking about since you can't explain why 100,000 junior hunters each year can't replace the loss of 71,000 total hunters over 4 years.
What you posted makes no sense. we all know we have declining numbers but you expect me to explain to you why 100,000 huntesr dont replace 71,000. Well if those were accurate and complete figures, that would have been a positive recruitment of around +50%. Since that's obviously not the case, your question makes no sense given the "facts" you presented
As for your other statement:
You want to argue about the decline in license sales ,but you don't even know how to access the PA license sales data. Now that's hoot!!!
Read it again spanky. I have the PGC website data. Cornelius is citing the USFWS and has provided no link. Thats what I asked him to produce and he hasn't done that. You twist the facts and he makes em up as he goes