ORIGINAL: bluebird2
There was no lie in my post and you obviously don't know what you are talking about since you can't explain why 100,000 junior hunters each year can't replace the loss of 71,000 total hunters over 4 years.
Smoke and mirrors again. Your question, in that context makes no sense. One cant assume that junior hunters are the only new hunters nor can you compare just those two numbers to ask your question. Provide the link to the source of your numbers and perhaps I can help you understand something.