ORIGINAL: bluebird2
What I'm sure you meant to say is that I havent presented a single fact that you didn't manage to twist into your own agenda with your distortions.
Now you know you don't rely on facts to support your position. Instead you resort to name calling and insults in an attempt to hide your lack of knowledge of the issues being discussed. This fact is exceedingly obvious since the PGC has as yet failed to produce ant data that shows the plan has succeeded as predicted .
We all know that you don't consider anything a "fact" unless it's presented in such a way that it supports your agenda. Whether quoting PGC data, Dr Kroll, Dr Samuel, Charles Alsheimer, Dr Alt or a host of other sources, your response is either "thats simply not true" "wrong again" or "He's biased" or something equally dismissive.
All the experts are either wrong or biased according to you. And yet you still have failed to mention any qualifications that make you better able to judge the data than all the folks who do it for a living. You simply refuse to consider any viewpoint but your own.Attempting to give youany facts has proven to be futile.