No solutions from Bluebird, just more whining and complaining.
Once again you are flat out ,dead wrong. I have said over and over again that the solution to the problem is for the PGC to manage the herd at the true carrying capacity of the habitat. Instead of worrying about buck dispersal or adult doe mortality, they should do a study why they are managing 2G at 12 PSDPSM while managing 2F at 22 PSDPSM ,while forest health is worse in 2F than in 2G?
You and the USP know you can't fool the real professionals so instead you're going to try to fool a judge. Your chances are better that way but they are still very slim.
The real professionals have fooled themselves into believing that reducing the herd below the true carrying capacity of the habitat would increase breeding rates and recruitment,while the PGC's own data shows the exact opposite occurred.Also, I pointed out where both Alsheimer and Kroll published false and misleading information in order to support QDM and sell magazines, and seeds and minerals for food plots.