ORIGINAL: bluebird2
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Have you considered trying to find a new and better defense of the PGC's flawed deer management plan? The anger management defense is getting old ,just like the nonsense being spewed by RSB.
The PGC data has shown that the plan has failed to produce the predicted results,so what facts can you provide that shows the plan was a success?
Thats what
you think alright. have a look at my new thread. More and more, people are seeing that things are working. Still lots of bugs to work out but at least we're not sitting around doing nothing while the herd eats itself out of house and home any more
The article says nothing about the current plan working. It simply says the monitoring methods used in the buck dispersal study were acceptable and that doe density and competition between bucks are "likely" both causes for dispersal. The study did nothing to improve deer management in PA and simply duplicated studies that were done in MD and Virginia.
For someone who loves to use selected littlebits of the whole picture, thats really amusing. What the article does is show one more way the PGC is trying to manage the herd with science on their side.
You definitely have an exceptional ability with figures. Too bad your neanderthal "deer behind every tree" agenda has clouded your judgement in how to use that ability.