ORIGINAL: bluebird2
“Later, studies that I conducted as a graduate student in Maryland identified competition among yearling males as a likely cause of dispersal. The present study demonstrated the likely involvement of both mechanisms in dispersal of white-tailed deer.”
So,after doing 3 studies they still don't know which is the major factor for buck dispersal and it is only "likely" that both mechanisms of dispersal are involved. Furthermore , the spread of disease among deer is not a major concern at this time, so the study did nothing to improve the current deer management in the state and did not benefit hunters in any way.
Thats funny coming from one who's sole purpose is to find fault with anything the PGc does and to find fault with virtually every deer management biologist out there today.
You sit there and offer no solutions to anything while you use data developed bythe target ofyour rantsagainst them by takingfacts out of context.
You are the consumate example of a spin doctor who is a master atassembling bits of true facts in order to assemble lies.
No solutions from Bluebird, just more whining and complaining.
Why don't you and your USP cronies go out and hire wildlife biologists of your own and compile your own data instead of swiping bits and pieces from the PGC? I'll tell you why! Because you know damn well that any biologist that does it right isn't going to do any better.
So instead, the USP spends its money on lawsuits hoping to snooker a judge by using your tactics. You and the USP know you can't fool the real professionals soinstead you're going to tryto fool a judge. Your chances are better that way but they are still very slim.