RE: PGC gets a pat on the back for it's deer program
The pat on the back would be a bit more meaningful if it werent them giving it to themselves.(LOL)[:'(] And it has very little, or nothingto do with the concepts of "the deer plan".
I also see nothing counter to anything we "neanderthals" LOL are saying. Its not "buck dispersal" (LOL)[:@] Or "them brushing up on disease management schemes"[8D]that we have a problem with. Thats also not why they arent getting a license fee increase, not why they are being sued, not why they are being petitioned, and have an audit pending... Maybe next the fashion society can do an analysis on Roes wardrobe and it to will support the plan? Maybe then all this negativity will go away? (LOL)
Its appropriate numbers of deer that the habitat can support and should hold, appropriate deer numbers, and also the supporting data be provided that would be sure to follow. Also some evidence ar is having no maleffectsgenetically would be nice. Currently none of this is occurring and none of this has been addressed. Theyd rather speak on nice sunny topics that have nothing to do with hunters concerns, and act like it somehow dismisses them![8D]
Maybe thanks to the lawsuit or the approved audit that never seems to come or the license fee denial will make these things be addressed, and maybe then someone other than themselves will pat them on the back for a change.