RE: Pa Game Comm. Overhaul
I'll type this a bit bigger as you seem to keep missing it maybe this will help:
According to the pgc2004/05 annual wildlifereport the change in 2A population index was an estimated-7%.
Now, given that fact, WHAT IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT IS HOLY was the grounds for RAISING the allocations to levels from 10,000 to 15,000 HIGHER in the following years, starting the VERY NEXT year, and harvest goals of 18,000 which was HIGHER than the 16,500 that reduced the herd in the last year??? And the goal was supposed to be stabilization...
No explanation necessary, as there cannot be one. Its a sham and that proves it. These things can be pointed out left and right when analyzing the claims and data. Couple this rediculous deception with the fact that all predictions have proven false and pgcs own data shows it beyond doubt.....that pgc needstossed on their duffs andrestructure withsome non-ecoextremists.
C'mon RSB, you can do it...say it with me now....Its a MISERABLY FAILED PROGRAM! (LOL)