"As I've said before, Alt said some of it wrong. The infamous more and bigger bucks is a clear example of that. We have bigger but not more. Plain and simple. "

We dont have bigger either. The largest bucks are no larger than they were previously. There also arent more big bucks. Extreme hr didnt allow for it.

"No, it makes the PGC more like the current administration. Having to make difficult choices."

and like current administration, a lotta wrong ones, guess we could also compare the current economy to Pgc making themselves go broke?

"The PGC is Putting up with distortions from the USP types like the Bush administration puts up with media distortions."

Im pure Republican, and will definately vote Mcain. But Bush isnt exactly our finest example.

"Bluebird and the USP sing the same old no deer for me song while failing to provide evn one solution of substance."

Im not speaking for Bluebird or USP, but I think they would agree, and or maybe have other ideas as well, but as a HUUUUGE starting point...What part of less doe tags dont you understand?

"Obama appeals to the lower IQ crowd with the tax only the rich chant while Bluebird appeals to the lower IQ crowd by chanting over and over that the habitata can support more deer"

While the higher IQ crowd sits back and laughs at your denying it as if it were notfact, and chuckling at your desparation tactics of constant namecalling of some of the posters here, as well as laughing at your analogies.[8D]


"There it is! the real reason for your tantrums. "More deer for me. There used to be more where I hunt and I want em back no matter what. Listen to me not thescientists about how many deer there should be""

I didnt say Me or I. I said the sport of hunting and hunters.And Im darn well gonna stick up for "us" and makeZERO appologies fordoing so,when ecoclowns are dictating our deer herd management and they are looking out for their own interests.You say "scientists" I say highly biased. Audubon has biologists, antihunting groups have theirs...That doesnt mean they would manage our deer herd in a responsible manner.

It Can be easily seen that OUR scientists are "special" and the "appropriate" minded individuals were hired to fulfill the extreme duties that were to come. Also,no other states would actin such extreme unbased manners, and certainly not stick with a proven failed plan.

"Well you can whine cry scream and kick but it aint gonna happen."

Just like Carl Roe and that fee increase if the hunters and legislators of our fine state continue to have anything to say about it.


"You think you have no voice now? Just wait till the DCNR calls all the shots and we'll have the likes of you and Bluebird to thank for it."

That system you fear works better than ours in most of thestates of the nation. Most dont have rogue special interest catering"independent"unanswering wildlife mangement agencies. Look around at the other posts in this thread,from other states...See any "deer wars" going on anywhere else? I dont.