That simply is not true and you are once again misrepresenting what I said. If you weren't so bias you might remember that I pointed out that Dr. Kroll indicated the decrease in rack sizes was due to genetics and I pointed out that Dr. Demarais said it was due to high grading. Dr. Kroll demonstrated a profound lack of knowledge about Miss. and Alsheimer demonstrated the same profound lack of knowledge about PA when he printed Alt's claims about ARs.
I really don't understand why you have to rely on accusing me of lying ,when you claim to have the facts to prove I am wrong. Wouldn't you be much more effective if you presented the facts to support your position like I do?
I must say that it takes an incredible amount of gall to claim that you have a better understanding of Miss than the most respected wildilfe biologist of our time.
My position is that I support the conclusions of the professionals most of the time. I'm not 100% happy with everychange thats been made.The process has been one of bumpy progress but I view it as progress nonetheless. The vast majority of wildlife scientists are on the same page as well.
Your position has been one of constant criticism of the current management without any positive input. I don't necessarily blame you for the lack of positive input because I realize that haven't the knowledge or expertise to provide any positive better ideas. You cling to the discredited (by his fellow biologists) findings of one wildlife manager as part of your "position" I think I'll hang with the majority. Just because you can't accept the fact that more responsible game managementis now the goal doesnt make you right.
Like the last USP lawsuit, your position is without merit. Your tenacity in continually take things out of context by using information developed by others to turn it around for your own agenda doesnt fly here. My position is to continue catch the distortions and point them out.