Thanks for finally providing the link. As I suspected,there is no statement advocatinga deer density that would provide a sustaineddoe harvest of 29 per square mile. That number is presented as the plan for a specific property where neighboring properties are not managed properly so the excess doe are killed off from within their relatively small parcel.
Here's what Alsheimer does say
Too often, landowners and deer managers have found themselves behind the power curve when it came to deer management. Today, some areas of the United States find deer populations exceeding 100 deer per square mile. To put this in perspective, most habitats can only tolerate 25-40 deer per square mile.
Once again, you have attempted to piece together parts of different truths to assemble a lie. Anyone with a brain need only read the entire article toget the proper perspective instead of your warped take on it.
Oh and this little gem....
Remember it was you ,not me, that make the false and misleading claims about Dr. Kroll's article about the results from Miss.
is one of your most pathetic lies yet. Your sole answer to Dr Krolls finding was to claim that he's biased. Sorry Larry,no cigar!