[quote ]Perhaps he can provide a link. [/quote]
He cant, it doesnt exist
In any event, it wasn't his proposal, it was the QDM crowd, obviously speaking of the properties that they routinely manage at such high densities.
The QDM crowd philosophy is exactly opposite.QDMA generally promotes lower densities and therefore a healthier herd.
As for Bluebird, I'm no newcomer to his discussions. I've been following this debate for good long time myself. I've rarely seen anyone with such a good grasp of the PGC data, and so efficient at using it to dispute the current deer plan.
I guess that should come as no surprise based on your obviously very shallow reading comprehension skills as evidenced in these last few pages
Maybe if you ask him "real nice", he will provide you with some details of his background, and how that qualifies him sufficiently to speak on habitat issues.
Asked many many times but never answered because no such qualifications exist
BTW, I didn't expect you would believe that I am anything other than a stump sitter, so your further speculation on my hunting ability doesn't bother me, either.
The fact that you are blindly buying into his 2+2 equals 3 numericalspinning of the facts tellsus about your real comprehension of the situation.The fact that you are so defensive aboutthe stereotype of the "stump sitter"as you call him that you brought it up and then just had to tell us what a good hunter you are says volumes about your self esteem in that area. When one is good at something, there is no need to have to tell someone. Defending ones self when nothing derogatory has even been said to them tells us of his own inferiority complex in that area. You are behaving exactly as one would expect from the stereotyped group thatyou so vocally claim not to be a part of.
The reason I continue to challenge bluebirds mind numbing deluge of numbers and facts out of context is to hopefully get a few to actuallyweed out the smoke and mirrors and look twiceat how he's arranged the numbers to his advantage. He's famous for taking this line from one place and that fact from another and part of a paragraph from another and putting them in the blender to completely rearrange the intent of a statement or report. Perhaps it's asking too much of you to read his posts with a little more scrutiny.