Actually the vast majority of the data you have provided has very little value since you selectively used 5 year averages designed to support your agenda. The PGC Annual Wildlife Reports , press releases and studies provide all the data needed to show that the plan has not produced the predicted results and that the herd is being managed considerably below the MSY carrying capacity of the habitat.

Furthermore, the forests in 2G, where the herd has been reduced the most,are still rated as having poor forest health. But, since the PGC has decided not to reduce the herd even more, they are admitting that herd reduction alone is not the answer to good forest health in 2G. Even Dr. Rosenberry couldn't tell me why 2F is being managed at 22 PS DPSM while 2G is managed at 12 PS DPSM and i found that to be very disappointing.