It isn't up to you or I to decide which studies are necessary or unnecessary. That's why they have biololgists on the staff, to help bureau directors, administrations and BOC members make such decisions.
That is true ,but you and I don't decide which studies are necessary, but we are all entitled to have an opinion on the need for these studies. The buck dispersal study, the fawn survival study and the adult doe survival study were interesting , but did nothing to improve deer management, or the health of the herd and were equivalent of public relation campaign to mislead hunters into believing the herd was being managed based on science rather than political influence.