Chuck is o.k. I do believe that you often have to separate the wheat from the chaff so-to-speak. I guess that's true for most all of the "experts".
My original questions were:
Does anyone here actually belive that Chuckhawks opinions are credible just because he makes money for giving them?
Do you think that being paid for your opinion makes you an expert on the topic.
So far nobody has answered those question.Do you give more credibility to someones opinion,because they have been published(even if it's only on their own web site) or because they are paid for their opinion?Does being paid or published automatically make a person an "expert"?