He wouldn' t want the buck listed if he feels like he got shafted by the organization.I personally wouldn' t give them the right to list the deer in their book if I had been treated that way.


This is a prime example of what makes the Buckmaster scoring far superior.IMO

I don' t think the organization is much better but the scoring system is far superior.

It is amazing that because the score has been changed,it automatically makes him quilty of something.

Now come on,how many of you out there would claim a deer that you shot a day or 2 earlier if you new it was your deer.I certainly would and I think 99.% of you would to.Heck I searched for 2 days for my daughters buck and it would have been on the wall if we had of found it.And if it was big enough to make the book.I would have had it scored by Buckmasters. With her name beside it.

We DON' T know if he killed the deer and there is NO WAY to prove otherwise.I would think if he hadn' t killed the deer that the rightfull shooter would be raising 9 kinds of heck.Is there someone making this claim?

I really think it is rediculous for someone to sit back and read a few articles and condem someone they don' t know.

GIVE IT A REST[&o]