HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Broadhead cutting diameter vs. tissue damage...
Old 07-23-2008 | 10:55 PM
  #13  
sandilands's Avatar
sandilands
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg MB Canada
Default RE: Broadhead cutting diameter vs. tissue damage...

ORIGINAL: annika3

I look at it 2 ways. Visually through experience. I shot fixed blades for 20 years and Snyper expandables for 5 and Rage 2 blade the last 2 years and the largest holes and the most damageby farhave been from the Rage and then the Snyper and then fixed.

The other way I look at it is by the numbers.

Cutting diameter and cutting surfaceare 2 different things.

Cutting diameter is the size of the wound created by the BH.
Cutting surface is the amount of damage within the cutting diameter.

Rage 2-blade:

Cutting diameter = 2"
Cutting surface= 2 5/16" including tip blade

This means you are causing 2 5/16" cutting damage within a 2" area. This means a very large hole and massive damage.

Any 4-blade 1" fixed

Cutting diameter = 1"
Cutting surface = 2"

This means you are causing 2" of cutting damage within a 1" area. As you can see all the damage is being done in a fairly small area with a fairly small hole.

Obviously if the arrow hits its mark it doesn't matter which heads you are using but it does matter if you are slightly off the mark.
Well put.
I'm gonna shoot my ST's this yr b/c I don't want to mess with my set up. I was hoping for the new grizztrick....... spring for bear is when I will try it. I like having 4 blades.
sandilands is offline  
Reply