HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Are bigger cartridges really better?
View Single Post
Old 07-22-2008 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
RugerM77.270's Avatar
RugerM77.270
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Alabama
Default RE: Are bigger cartridges really better?

ORIGINAL: rather_be_huntin

ORIGINAL: Hurricanespg

From my point of view though if a person can kill one with a bow and arrow, then pretty much any rifle will do.
Uuuummmmmmmmm........I see what you're trying to say there but you're not comparing apples to apples. An arrow and a bullet kill in different manners so you can't bring a bow and arrow to a gun fight.

Arrows kill by hemorrhaging and bullets kill by trama. (Although granted they do sometimeskill by hemorrhaging if the trama doesn't work) But just not the same. I certainly would not agree that because an arrow is effective that any old rifle cartridge will do.
I agree when an arrow enters an animals body it usually cuts a wound channel at least 1 inch in diameter. Where as a small caliber bullet may leave a wound channel 1/2 in diameter but relies on the destructive force of the bullets velocity and extreme energy delivery to kill an animal.

So can you kill a large animal with a small caliber weapon? Yes. Can a larger caliber weapon kill more "efficiently"? Yes. If you don't believe me go out and shoot two 90 lbs. does, one with a .223 one with a 50 bmg and compare the two. Both just as dead as the other but the one shot with the 50 was killed more "efficiently" though not for the table.
RugerM77.270 is offline  
Reply