I just got done reading all 40 pages of the ruling. Interesting stuff....The plaintiffs are crying foul on the original criteria. Apparently when this first came about there was supposed to be documented genetic crossover between areas. They claim that has not been done and will cause irrepairable damage... I say hoopla, how can these things spread and not be related? Wyoming is back to being a controversy as the ruling states that depredation of the wolves is not factored in when calculating harvest #'s.....

I say we put a bunch in a box and take them on roads trips, this should cause the genetic crossover that they speak of....