HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - 349.00 for a triumph
View Single Post
Old 07-18-2008 | 11:42 AM
  #9  
arcticap's Avatar
arcticap
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Central Connecticut
Default RE: 349.00 for a triumph

ORIGINAL: Semisane

I wouldn't buy something that's not what you really want just to save a few bucks. Two days after you buy it you'll be thinking, "heck, for $50 more I could have had a ...."
Weathershield is only a "psuedo-stainless" anyway, so why not just spurge andbuy real stainless then?

I recently posted about this one reported problem with Wethershield. Granted it's an isolated incident and under warranty, but is Weathershield all that's it'scracked upto be?
Someone on THR posted about corrosion starting upunderneath the Weathershield finish onhisnearly newOmega.
TCtold him to send it in under warranty:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=377188
The same with the BDC scope, is it over-rated or is it as good as Nikon wants people to think? That's why I previously posted the pdfmanual, because it describes some of the pitfalls of the BDC reticle.

http://nikonsro.com/fileuploads/pdfs/OMEGA_manual.pdf

It goes onto say that after experiementation, the user canaimusing the top or bottom of the circles. Maybe theOmega scope with theconventional Nikoplex reticle is better than having too much faith in the BDC reticleonly to find out later that it doesn't work quitethe sameasadvertised. Who usuallyreads the manual before buyinga scopeanyway?


arcticap is offline  
Reply