ORIGINAL: BigJ71
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
The P&Y doesn't but I guess there bad apples too!! We all have our opinions, respect them!
Schultzy, that in my opinion is not in itself a reason or valid example to
not consider crossbows as "archery tackle". I say this because there are some compound bows that do not qualify for P&Y either yet they are considered by most as "archery tackle".
The P&Y is not the reason why I say what I say but I am happy on there stance although there stance has weakened very much the last 15 years or so. Where would technology be in bow hunting if they didn't care? Why is it when someone who doesn't believe a crossbow is legit archery equipment get slammed so bad? Its an opinion just as yours and mine is.