HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - NAP Spitfire Experiences and Entry Holes
Old 07-06-2008 | 10:04 PM
  #29  
superstrutter's Avatar
superstrutter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: North Louisiana
Default RE: NAP Spitfire Experiences and Entry Holes

ORIGINAL: annika3

As you have read, the exit hole is what people say is good on a Spitfire, not the entry hole, and the entry holeis by far the most important hole. If you don't get an exit hole you are much better off having a large entrance hole and that is what the Rage 2 blade gives you. I don't think pictures lie and the pictures of the entrance AND exit holes of a Rage is pretty impressive.

What? An entry hole is far more important than an exit hole? Who told you that one?Of course you have to have an entry hole to have an exit hole, but the exit hole is where most of the blood loss occurs, therefore a quicker kill. I know you don't have to have an exit hole to kill a deer, but I promise, with a big exit hole in the right place, the deer is not going very far, and with a good blood trail. The Spitfire leaves a great exit hole. I'm not going to get in a pissing match about which is better, rage or spitfire. They are both good, and you can use whatever you want. No broadhead is effective if it is not put in the right spot.
superstrutter is offline  
Reply