There are no amendments in the Bill of rights that discuss color at all or anything to which you infer. Those first 10 would have been the ones that were in a particular order for a reason (...although the 2nd should have been first
). Isn't really relative that other amendments were added at later times is it??
What reason would there be to assign a (perceived) "order of importance? Where is it said that they were put in "order of importance"?
It isn't realtive to the argument....as long as you aren't a black man. Ask a black man about your "order of importance". As far as I'm concerned......the subsequent amendments blow that notion clean out of the water.
"Socialist"???....lol....Where in the hell did THAT come from? We're discussing strict constructionism....or...I thought we were.