Ok, I think I' ll chime in here. Yes, the Zaft story does seem rather fishy. But reading the two different articles a few posts back, you have to remember that that one is narrarated by Zaft himself, and the other was done in third person. If you ask me, the first person version is factual. When someone else writes a story about actual events, the actual events somehow seem to change. Look at the media and the Iraqi war. I' m getting sick and tired of hearing, " Soldiers find chemical weapons dump, or facility or what-not." Mainly because they haven' t, but I' m sure that they will eventually. What I' m getting at is, you seem to have way to much time on your hands and seem totally obsessed with degrading the Zaft name. Just give it up. He shot a world class deer, he' s making money off of it, and your just jealous. Hell I' m jealous. If I shot a world class deer I' d be selling out to make some change just like anyone else. I can see that his buck will most likely not be the world record...but doesn' t it just get your goat that he' s most likely already made a couple hundred thousand dollars on this buck. Even without it being declared the new world record[:-] White-Raven dude...you need a new hobbey. You seem to spend more time investigating this Zaft controversy than you do out in the woods scouting trying to tag your own buck. You ever read the Stephen King Novel ' Misery' ? Yeaaaah...can you say Psycho?