Raven, I will agree with you that IF the Zaft deal is bogus, and I will admit that it does seem very fishy, then he should be exposed. I remember the whole Rompola deal very well. My buddy' s and I followed it as it came out in the mags, papers etc. Same with the Noel feather fiasco. If these guys do these things then I am glad if they are exposed and I believe that they should face the ramifications. But I just can' t see letting it become a top priority in my life. And by reading alot of the posts in answer to you, I truly believe that alot of others feel the same way. It just seems that you truly take a delight in trying to dispute people. As I said , I don' t want want to see some guy get notoriety from a bogus hunting success. But not everyone out there is a bad egg. like I said before, Mike Beatty went through alot of garbage of being accused of all types of violations. I know this for a fact because my cousin is involved the the Ohio DNR, and I heard the stories from him and our local game warden. But the guy was on the up and up and went through this stuff needlessly. I just think that people see you as someone who is so quick to jump on someone elses sucess and try and disprove it. Then when someone questions your motives the name calling begins. To me it is ridiculous. I have never ever had a problem on any of these forums with anyone. And I considered biting my lip and not saying anything on this subject or the whole Big Cat conspiracy. But I finally put my .02 in like alot of others. Sorry to say it, but I stick to my original post. I just think that alot of people are truly tired of your theories. And yes you can say that if I don' t like the truth I don' t have to read it. You are right. I will admit it is entertaining!! But truthfully, it is not the big world problem right now. It seems that you have a very fragile ego, and as soon as someone disagrees with you the gloves come off. Now, you can come back again if you want and slam me or put me down, that is fine. Trust me, in has no bearing or importance on my life at all. I am not trying to be malicious with you. I am just giving my observation of being in aggreement of ALOT of others opinions on here. If you honestly , and I mean honestly, go back and read all the threads you are on and the replies, there are very few people in agreement with you. There are also very little positive exchanges between you and other members. I guess that if I stepped back and saw that between myself and others, I would start looking at the guy in the mirror. I honestly believe that there indeed alot of people who question the authenticity of the whole Zaft thing. I know that I do. But again, I think that others aren' t against questioning his situation and others like it, they just call into question your methods and why that disputing people are so important to you. That is the big issue. Not the topic, but the way you go about it.I know that I have opened myself up to your criticism and that is fine. I have no problem with that. I am a big boy and and it truly won' t affect me. But I truly think that maybe you need to step back and observe your methods and how you present your case. Then you might see why people oppose you so much. I am done now. I truly am not trying to start a war with you. Just giving another opinion. Gotta go, my wife and I have a couple of bows and some pointy sticks that need some play time!