HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Do you think there is degrees in the effectiveness of a double lung?
Old 06-17-2008 | 11:23 AM
  #17  
RobinAim Low
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: StL, MO
Default RE: Do you think there is degrees in the effectiveness of a double lung?

ORIGINAL: killadoe

Do you think one part of the lungs would prove more fatal than the other.
Nope, no such thing as "more fatal" is there? That is like saying one deer is "more dead" than another... Couldn't resist that one.

I actually disagree with most, in that by far for me, high lunghits have brought my deer down the quickest. Regardless of opinion on the best part of the lungs, I am sure that some areas of the lungs have a higher density of vessels. I think you could make a case for a difference in effectiveness between lungs fully inflated at impact vs. deflated at impact as well.

I know for darn sure there is a difference in effectiveness on liver hits.I have had liver hits die in minutes and have some last between 8-12 hours.
RobinAim Low is offline  
Reply