HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?
Thread: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?
View Single Post
Old 04-21-2003 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
wimp
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default RE: why a .17 caliber and not a .223 caliber?
I' ve always understood the 17 to have less pelt damage.
wimp is offline  
Reply
0