Actually, believe it or not, me too. If it's a hands on question or problem about tuning or choice of equipment or any of a number of other practical down to earth archery type problems I think ArthurP is a great source. He's a wealth of experience. However, if it's a scientific problem or question, Arthur is clearly no scientist. I'm pretty sure he doesn't claim to be either. When it is a scientific question, and that's what this argument has been, then I'll go with the real scientists and engineers who have developed the scientific theory that explains what's going on.


The question of "What arrow mass will achieve tha maximum momentum?" is a scientific question. The scientific theory that gives you theanswer to that question and explains why was developed a long time ago. It might make you all feel like big shots to think you know better but none of you do. I'd say the metaphor is litlle fish in a little pond with with egos the size of whales. lol, I like that!