LOL I have read your exact same argument by traditional shooters against compound bow shooters. Interesting to say the least.
I wouldn't disagree with that. It is more difficult to hunt with a traditional bow than a compound. Otherwise,why would anyone buy a compound?
Actually it is an opinion, yours. The picture can be paintedhowever we want and we can call it fact but that doesn't make it so and someone with a differnt brush might paint it diiferently.
Too many people living in grey areas these days. A crossbow is a step up from a compound. Sure, some of us love weapons of all sorts, nothing wrong with crossbows. It's a better weapon.It'd be tough for somebodywith a compoundto outshoot somebody at 30 yards with a crossbow in a tree withit beingrested. The whole idea of opening up crossbows for everybody during archery is to get more people involved in hunting. That's a good thing. Many of whom would never get involved in "archery" otherwise, because of the real or perceived difficulty of it. Is their such a thing as bad crossbow form? I think not.
On one can hold a crossbow steadier than a compound. You compound shooters have it easier than the traditional or crossbow hunter. My last deer was stalked to within 15 yds with a wide, heavy crossbow.
So you're saying you can hold a crossbow steadier than a compound, but it easier to hunt with a compound? I'm confused?